RE: A.S.K. your way to proof.
March 26, 2020 at 1:15 pm
(This post was last modified: March 26, 2020 at 1:28 pm by Drich.)
(March 25, 2020 at 7:07 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:5(March 25, 2020 at 1:35 pm)Drich Wrote: because you toe the line sport. You can never say anything so unpopular that you have over 100 members threaten to quit or get rid of one guy. you have no idea what it is like to be hated so much. most of you snow flakes have no idea how to function when the group has turned on you. For this reason alone is enough that the admins would never have to rule against you.
NOT TO MENTION THE RULING WAS FOR ME!
Are you so stupid as to not understand the implication?
To be exonerated for not breaking a rule then be ban for being exonerated? it means the admins hands were tied. they are letting everyone know like pilate they can find nothing wrong with this me, and washed their hands of it and handed me over to the mob which demanded i be bann for breaking a rule i was found innocent of breaking!!!
or did all of this go over your head?
said: No one of consequence
It's "to be BANNED". We've already been through this sport.
yes we did and you are still wrong dummy.
To save this word, you'll need to log in.
[/url]Log In
\ ˈban \
banned; banning
Definition of ban
(Entry 1 of 3)
[url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transitive]transitive verb
1: to prohibit especially by legal meansban discrimination
Is smoking banned in all public buildings?
also : to prohibit the use,
performance, or distribution of ban a book
ban a pesticide
2: banned from the U.N.
3archaic : It is a hard fate … to be banned … by the world, only because one has sought to be wiser than the world is.— Edward Bulwer Lytton
intransitive verb
use:
They signed agreements banning the use of chemical weapons. He was banned for three months for driving with no insurance.
...
ban Definitions and Synonyms
present tense
he/she/it
bans
present participle
banning
past tense
banned
past participle
banned
have been banned from the website...
verse
those doosh bags ban me for not breaking the rules.
do you not understand present and past tenses?
(March 25, 2020 at 10:09 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:yo mamma (she so fat she counts as 9) and yo daddy (he's no account) and you.(March 25, 2020 at 1:35 pm)Drich Wrote: because you toe the line sport. You can never say anything so unpopular that you have over 100 members threaten to quit or get rid of one guy.
100 members?!? Name ten.

Quote:Neither do you, poor little white boy.kinda do and im not white. I could have been saved from 1/2 the fights in my life if i were.
Quote:No it wasn't. The ruling was that you hadn't quite pissed the admins off enough to ban you that time.it was for me as an admin specificly said "he is creating content for this website and has done nothing wrong.
Then one of the others admins who i think only posted once posted in my last post and said he is going to change either his vote or the other admins vote on what i was doing. cant remember don't have access. either way later on was ban for an act i was exonerated from originally..
Quote:I understand that you couldn't stop being a jackass with a future that was obvious to everybody. Tell me, was it deliberate?if the future is so obvious, then why is it ok here to do? but not there?
make you feel any batter there was a 60 page rant where everyone tried to get me ban here. same deal people threatened to leave, but the admins here believe in the preservation of free speech with in the rules and have enough integrity to stand up to fascists who want to have total control or mastery of anything being discussed.
Quote:To be exonerated for not breaking a rule
![[Image: you-keep-using-that-word.jpg]](https://nbbumnd0bj-flywheel.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/you-keep-using-that-word.jpg)
[/quote]
because i as everyone else was literally told in my second to last thread i had done nothing wrong.
why can't you simply except how unfair people who are not like you can be treated by your peers? really if you guys had all the answers then why would have to come down to silencing a voice by ban rather than debate?