A.S.K. your way to proof.

[Paleophyte]

100 members?!? Name ten.

yo mamma (she so fat she counts as 9) and yo daddy (he's no account) and you.
 like what i did there?

You mean failed to name a single person who called for your ban? Waiting for these hundred members. List them or be forever known a liar.

No it wasn't. The ruling was that you hadn't quite pissed the admins off enough to ban you that time.

it was for me as an admin specificly said "he is creating content for this website and has done nothing wrong.

Except you hadn't created it for that website, as you've admitted.

Is that really what the admins said? Or did it read more like "We can't quite justify banning your dumb ass yet but stop acting like a jack-ass"?

but the admins here believe in the preservation of free speech

The argument from free speech is the ultimate concession. It concedes that the best thing that can be said for your argument is that you cannot literally be jailed for making it.

because i as everyone else was literally told in my second to last thread i had done nothing wrong.

Getting away with it is not the same as not doing anything wrong.

why can't you simply except how unfair people who are not like you can be treated by your peers?

Poor baby doesn't have an atheist forum to preach at. Would you like some cheese with that whine?

---

@Drich

100 members?! Jesus Christ, Drich it was like, four. Your delusions of grandeur are really quite entering. 😂🤦‍♀️

It's like the tale of the loaves and fishes. A lot less impressive when it's Jesus making tuna sandwiches to feed three.