RE: Atheist Dogma
April 16, 2020 at 5:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2020 at 5:45 pm by Prof.Lunaphiles.)
(April 14, 2020 at 7:20 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: I don't know. This guy comes in like he has all the answers but clams up for days after posting. It is beyond annoying.I sympathize with your grievance, but I am doing it, because I have gone through it several times, already - the arguments are no different.
The arguments indicate that the respondents are not reading and comprehending that the definition of theism is incorrect. It does not make sense for atheists to accept a definition that does not assign doctrine to the definition to theism. Atheists prove this when they argue that theists have to be indoctrinated to believe in something that does not exist. The use of "believe," in a definition is flimsy, and gets absurd when referring to "disbelief," and "non-belief," and the like.
(April 14, 2020 at 9:40 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote:(April 14, 2020 at 9:11 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote: Why is it annoying? It's standard issue AF fare, without trolls this place is nothing.
Again, I'll point out that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. This place was great without trolls and could be great again.
This place was never great. I never read any reviews of any atheist forum that recommended atheists, and/or theist, to participate, because the forum was deliberating truth and advancing the participants expectations.
What was it about this place that leads you to have described it as great, and what happened - trolls disrupted the greatness???
(April 13, 2020 at 12:41 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:I would bet that I am of very few that you are suggesting actual are, and probably the only person who is making the claims that the definitions of the words significant to the atheists' sense of atheism are inaccurate and adversely effecting the reasoning abilities of individual atheists and the organizational ambitions of atheist activities.(April 11, 2020 at 9:06 pm)Prof.Lunaphiles Wrote: I can guarantee you that I am right.The track record of people who make that claim is pretty pathetic. I would never say it. People can figure out for themselves from what I say whether I'm right about something, I don't expect them to take my word for it. I'd actually like it if they can destroy my ideas; I'm better off the fewer ideas I have that can't stand up to scrutiny, I think.