[Serious] Atheist Dogma

[Prof.Lunaphiles]

Moderator Notice
Deleted duplicate post

---

When I was staff, I came up with the idea of staff quorum, id est, that for staff rulings, one needed a number of votes to action. Like, to give a warning, x votes were needed, to temporary ban y votes were needed and for bans more z votes were needed (spammers banned on sight OFC).

What I didn't antecipate was the growing legislation that turned an idea into that we need to be lawyers to do something.

Good effort, you are to be commended for trying.

There needs to be a system of rules generated that lead people to form juries, and litigation teams based on defending organizational doctrines. It is difficult to do with mediocre Internet forum members who are more inclined to be casual posters without abiding by strict rules of dialectics that would be ultimately necessary. But it is eventually coming - the first person to figure out how to compose such a system of rules will probably be the next Mark Zuckerburg, because that is what people are unwittingly believing is possible to be conducted on the Internet.