RE: Atheist Dogma
April 19, 2020 at 8:59 pm
(This post was last modified: April 19, 2020 at 9:06 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:In many cases I'm sure that's true.In this case it's true
Quote:When we hear and evaluate claims, however, we do so based on criteria of judgment. Thinking people who reject claims have reasons.Not required for atheism
Quote:It may be that lots of people reject claims based purely on prejudice or force of habit. That's not something to be proud of, and I hope that this is not the case with most atheists.It's not
Quote:Rejecting the claim that God made the stars requires, for thinking people, a number of things we hold to be true. These include, but are not limited to:None of the above
~ What the word "God" means.
~ What stars are.
~ How stars are generally thought to be formed.
Quote:If you claim there is no evidence for such a position, then you already have beliefs about what constitutes evidence.Nope it only requires the theist can't back up their claims .No previous criteria required .
Quote:If you reject the claim without having any of those things in your mind then I think you're just allowing it to bounce off your skull for no reason. It's better to have reasons.Nope
Theist -God created stars
Atheist -I have reason to accept that idea .Even if he atheist knows nothing about stars or the definition of god or has any episolomolgy at all it's valid
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM