RE: Atheist Dogma
April 21, 2020 at 6:52 pm
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2020 at 6:55 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Atheism does not have a dogma.
It doesn't
Quote: Atheism has doctrine describing what it is the designation for - definition .No it doesn't
Quote:Atheists have a dogma based on the incorrect definitions of words significant to their conversations about theism and religion that keep atheists occupied in a proverbial box just like theists.Nope
Quote:The doctrinaire for humanist is all of the world's knowledge. The problem being that there lacks a reliable classification system that aides in understanding the relativity of the categories - words.Wrong
Quote:I certainly agree that there are dogmatic atheists.People who constantly repeat Christian talking points are suspect and this denial is just that a denial and no one here has demanded you honor anyone
It's a kind of paradox on this forum and elsewhere that everyone insists all atheists only have one thing in common, but if a person diverges from forum orthodoxy he is immediately accused of being not a real atheist. For example by denying that atheism is lack and only lack, or by refusing to honor the greatness of C. Hitchens.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
