Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.

[Statler Waldorf]

Oh we understand them just fine. The logical fallacy, I've learned, it called the bare assertion fallacy.

You are good at tossing out the names of random fallacies; unfortunately you fail at demonstrating how they are even applicable, which makes your tactic nothing more than a bare assertion. Ironic huh? :-P

It's not sufficient to posit god exists and then use that assumption to prove something else.

Please point to exactly where any of us have done this.

You have to provide evidence for your assertions before you can use them to prove anything else.

We already have. The fact that you can prove anything at all is proof that the God of scripture exists. It is proof through negation.

Still waiting for you to explain the Trinity to me.

Tick tock.

*Plays theme to Jeapordy*

It’s not hard to explain (I'll go down that rabbit trail). God the Father, Christ, and the Holy Ghost are three persons that are one in essence (God).