RE: A.S.K. your way to proof.
April 23, 2020 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2020 at 4:03 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:but again why have me fix or take a way an advantage to you?It would be good if you fixed it , And i couldn't care less about this so called advantage . As i said i'm not playing games .
Quote:it's not like you are tearing down my arguement by addressing the subject matter.This assumes my goal is tear something down .Rather than simply pointing something out . If you choose to fix it well good for you .
Quote: look at this discussion. you only tactic is to attack me personally,Pointing your analogies are bad is not a personnel attack nor is pointing out your seeming love of using them . You clearly looking at a very different conversation .
Einstein seemed to love using unrealistic and confusing analogies to express his ideas (pointing out something about Einstein's methods not attacking him personally)
Einstein was a stupid moron who used shit analogies to push his retarded nonesense because he was a fucking jew (personnel attack )
Dich seems to love using bad analogies to express his ideas (pointing out something about Dirch's methods not attacking him personally))
Dirch was a stupid moron who used shit analogies to push his retarded nonesense because he was a fucking unitard (personnel attack )
Quote: so again why have me fix you only viable means of attack?It would be good if you fixed it. I don't care about attacking at least not in this case .
Quote: almost feel sorry for you.. your either pretty stupid or desperate to say anything as a come back. either way that comment reaks of desperation.The point was i don't care about showing my hands because i'm not trying to play games with you , And this wasn't a comeback it was clearly a joke in response to you using the term hands .
Quote:Sorry sport, but your ignorance of the word is shinning through here.
Bitching, (as it applies here):
verb (used without object)
Slang. to complain; gripe:
They bitched about the servi
False .Someone can point out a shortfall of something for no tactical reason and it not have it be bitching
ce, then about the bill.
2- To continuously complain about something
Without point or purpose your repeated notification become bitching.
Tut Tut
Sorry "Sport"
Pointing out the shortfall that you make poor analogies is not complaining it's pointing something out ,And i said no TACTICAL purpose .You can point out a fact without tactical reason but merely to point out the fact out and doing so repeatedly is not bitching .So all you have done is quote a definition that doesn't apply to my comment.
To make the example apply to my comment
They pointed out the food was undercooked .Then they pointed out the bills print wasn't legible.
Let's compare
Sangula pointed out Dirch makes terrible analogies that are ineffectual
So to sum up my notifications to you pointing out the fact you make bad analogies is itself a point and a purpose .Even if i'm not doing it in some tactical ends .
So no tut tut to you
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM