(April 29, 2020 at 12:07 pm)Drich Wrote: "the word being the very word of John 1:1/Jesus"
To give some meaning to this thread, let's focus on this one:
Quote:The Seminar treats the canonical gospels as historical sources that represent Jesus' actual words and deeds as well as elaborations of the early Christian community and of the gospel authors. The Fellows placed the burden of proof on those who advocate any passage's historicity. Unconcerned with canonical boundaries, they asserted that the Gospel of Thomas may have more authentic material than the Gospel of John.[8]
Wikipedia -- The Jesus Seminar
Do you agree with the above conclusion? If not, why not?