A.S.K. your way to proof.

[Drich]

sorry sport i studied this guy. he was mockingly a deist because he did not have the balls to wear the social stigma that came with being labeled an atheist back then. one could be ban from shops public services like police protection and even having been accused of dark magic. deism was the safest thing this guy could align himself with ans still carry out his attacks on god and the church as his 'nod to god' came in the way of a naturalism where he assigned the title to fit the engine that ran the natural world. IE god to him was not a deity but more of a source of power or energy. Plus on his death bed he refused God stating he at this point would not want to make any more enemies.

None of this proves he didn't believe in god and if that quote is to be believed or taken literally that it  actually undermines your point so i question your supposed study of him .As for the quote it's questionable 

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/08/13/no-enemies/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltaire#Death_and_burial

https://www.thoughtco.com/biography-of-voltaire-4691229

cute, but this is not how research works. you have tertiary sources trying to topple evidence use from a verified primary source. Primary source in this case being a paper/tretis written by Voltaire himself which directly contradicts things people/fake news says about him. His words correctly and contextually quoted will ALWAYS Trump someone else's thoughts on the man.
your source work is garbage. it is third hand information while i am quoting Voltaire himself.
you can just by your word think it carries enough weight to dismiss a direct quote. it doesn't my post and the quote with the citation stand.

if you want to argue this go write a peer reviewed paper with BS tertiary sourced material and come back to me. because you are effective using an editorial in the enquirer/a tabloid to refute a recorded and well documented statement from the source himself.

being apposed to God does. most of you are not atheist by definition either you all share more with voltare than you will ever admit in that you hate God, not that you do not believe in him. people who do not believe do not waist their time arguing for years over their same points. this is hatred that fuels this passion.
Whatever you want to call voltare he is the father of the movement now known as atheism.

Voltaire never said he was opposed to god and hell even if he did that would make him theist not an atheist .Nope because i would first have to accept it exists which Voltaire clearly did .

if you have ever properly studied the man and read his works and the thing he himself said like the quoted tretis of 1763 his acceptance to 'god' was a farce to allow him to not be ostracized in his community. in the quoted i gave yesterday He himself said that if:
"This little globe, which is but a point, rolls through space, as do many other globes; we are lost in the immensity of the universe. Man, only five feet high, is assuredly only a small thing in creation. One of these imperceptible beings says to another one of his neighbors, in Arabia or South Africa: 'Listen to me, because God of all these worlds has enlightened me: there are nine hundred million little ants like us on the earth, but my ant-hole is the only one dear to God; all the other are cast off by Him for eternity; mine alone will be happy, and all the others will be eternally damned."
They would then interrupt me, and ask which fool blabbed all this nonsense. I would be obliged to answer, "You, yourselves." I would then endeavor to calm them, which would be very difficult.

HE IS MOCKING PEOPLE AND THEIR IDEA OF GOD!

How could he mock them if he believed in any form of God?!?!

Can't you see into his words and meaning or are you too ignorantly stuck in today's dialect to see his intentions?
the blue he appeals to the vastness of space and man's scientific understanding of it all even the religious people could understand this.
then in green he points to how small and insignificant man is.in the red he speaks OF ALL GOD BELIEVING MEN Who claim to represent the one true God.
The dark blue bold is voltare mocking the doctrines of salvation by saying out of the hundred millions of different views it is my colony of ant my religious sect that has God care for us while damning everyone else!
In the black bold underline this is the dig this is the zing this is the stinger. In that religious people are so stupid that they in his analogy would not see themselves as the small little ant who would claim the God of the vast universe would only bless their little hole/colony. that if he told the Theists this they would form a mob that would be difficult to calm down.

If dude was not an atheist why is he using the VERY SAME BS Arguments you yourself have made as an atheist? why does he draw a line between believers in God and mocks them, their doctrine and their understanding of how random life is? why is he speaking for a scientifically enlighten position and not defending his knowledge of God. Answer he was a atheist in deeds but not proclamation. he was a coward this work among several other prove this.

obb. that is not the proper 1763 quote.
The following is the proper quote:
It does not require great art, or magnificently trained eloquence, to prove that Christians should tolerate each other. I, however, am going further: I say that we should regard all men as our brothers. What? The Turk my brother? The Chinaman my brother? The Jew? The Siam? Yes, without doubt; are we not all children of the same father and creatures of the same God?
But these people despise us; they treat us as idolaters! Very well! I will tell them that they are grievously wrong. It seems to me that I would at least astonish the proud, dogmatic Islam imam or Buddhist priest, if I spoke to them as follows:
"This little globe, which is but a point, rolls through space, as do many other globes; we are lost in the immensity of the universe. Man, only five feet high, is assuredly only a small thing in creation. One of these imperceptible beings says to another one of his neighbors, in Arabia or South Africa: 'Listen to me, because God of all these worlds has enlightened me: there are nine hundred million little ants like us on the earth, but my ant-hole is the only one dear to God; all the other are cast off by Him for eternity; mine alone will be happy, and all the others will be eternally damned."
They would then interrupt me, and ask which fool blabbed all this nonsense. I would be obliged to answer, "You, yourselves." I would then endeavor to calm them, which would be very difficult.

The dude is making fun of Buddhist and Muslims. As everything i just quoted is his version of a over simplifies summary of what he thinks they believe, and when he serves it to them in this way, he mocks their preceived response. 
This is what you 'good people' do all the time.

Yup him mocking organized religion this neither refutes my point or shows his atheism .I

as point out above it does. as all religions were included in the quote. if he were apart of any religious movement then he would not defer his knowledge base to the science of the time, rather than doctrine. As then Science was a clown school farce of intellect. that the church was the supreme authority in education knowledge and learning. all major universities Harvard Yale oxford Dartmouth all of them had religious based/filtered curriculum. Voltaire unprecedentedly took scientific fact out of the religiously filtered education system, and for the first time used science to separate himself from God.

Before this science was sponsored by the church and was a study in how god worked. Men like Voltaire are seen as the fathers of modern atheism because they took science from the church and used it to create a divide between the knowledge of science and God. his 1763 tretis is a example of this.

I do not need a commentator to think for me. i have spent time in the study of voltaire which is why i can run through you guys like water through single ply toilet paper. I understand your foundations even if you do not.

No your dunning kruger guides you (you can't even spell his name right )

and your has you ignorantly posting tertiary source material IN VOLUME to try and refute a direct primary source. This would indicate you are not even smart enough to have this conversation let alone be in a position to grade or judge someone else's work. Yet i had the good grace to see past your personal failing and lack of or the inability you have to identify and rank evidence properly. Rather i held you hand and explained to you your failings as a intelligent man.

educate yourself before you speak to me moron:
https://subjectguides.esc.edu/researchsk...al/primary

Disputed 

here sport.. this is a map from town town genva to the actual house:


here is the recorded history of the house:


here is a link to the bible society so you can scheduled a tour and buy a bible at their gift shop.


doesn't seem disputed to me, unless you mean to say it is shut down at this moment due to covid-19

Yes disputed 

citation please


like this:
Several examples of his slanderous words against the Christian faith and the Bible are cited.

In 1764 he wrote, “The Bible. That is what fools have written, what imbeciles commend, what rogues teach and young children are made to learn by heart” (Voltaire, Philosophical Dictionary, 1764).   “We are living in the twilight of Christianity” (Philosophical Dictionary). In a 1767 letter to Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, he wrote: “Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd, and bloody religion that has ever infected the world…My one regret in dying is that I cannot aid you in this noble enterprise of extirpating the world of this infamous superstition.”[2] Voltaire ended every letter to friends with “Ecrasez l’infame” (crush the infamy — the Christian religion). In his pamphlet, The Sermon on the Fifty (1762) he attacked viciously the Old Testament, biblical miracles, biblical contradictions, the Jewish religion, the Christian God, the virgin birth and Christ’s death on the cross.  Of the Four Gospels he wrote, “What folly, what misery, what puerile and odious things they contain [and the Bible is filled] with contradictions, follies, and horrors”[3]. Voltaire regarded most of the doctrines of the Christin faith – the Incarnation, the Atonement, the Trinity, Communion – as folly and irrational.[4] And finally, “To invent all those things [in the Bible], the last degree of rascality. To believe them, the extreme of brutal stupidity!”
Many more such quotes could be cited as to Voltaire’s disdain for Christianity, but those will suffice. Voltaire’s writings were so divisive that in 1754 Louis XV banned him from Paris. Relocating in December 1754 to Geneva, Switzerland, he purchased a beautiful chateau called Les Delices (The Delights). He lived there for five years until 1760 when as the result of his antagonistic writings and plays attacking Christianity, he was virtually driven from Geneva by the Calvinist Reformers. To escape the pressure from the Calvinists, Voltaire moved across the border to Ferney, France, where the controversial Frenchmen lived for eighteen years until the end of his life in 1778 at age 83. He continued to write until his hand was stilled in death.

Now the question arises as to the veracity of what some call an “apocryphal story.” While Voltaire’s disdain for the Bible is evident, did he ever make such a prediction and did any Bible Society ever use either of his residences, from where he wrote his blasphemous words against the Bible and the Christianity, as a warehouse to store Bibles? The answer to that question is an emphatic, “YES!”

https://crossexamined.org/voltaires-pred...ification/