RE: I'm not lion.
May 21, 2020 at 8:51 am
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2020 at 8:53 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(May 21, 2020 at 8:48 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(May 21, 2020 at 8:45 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: We DON’T know it wasn’t the case. I’m simply pointing out that using an actual lion pelt for a costume isn’t necessarily a bad thing.Creating a market for lion pelts is as good a putting the rifle in the poacher's hands.
If the producers of the film had said, ‘We need a lion skin for a costume, let’s kill a lion’, I would object. If (as seems more likely, if only from a cost standpoint) they purchased a pelt or had one taking up space in the props department, what’s the harm?
Boru
I really don’t think that MGM created a market for lion pelts. And - as much as I despise trophy hunting - not all lion kills are the work of poachers. Not now, and certainly not in 1939.
And you’re still assuming the lion was killed to make the costume.
Boru