Oh, and to add, the logical fallacy also used here is Argumentum Ad Neuseum, where you just keep repeating the same argument that's already been addressed. In fact, I did account for why I use logic (basically, "I want to" and "I like the results"). Meanwhile, your account "GodWillsIt" does nothing to explain why you use logic, for reasons discussed ad neuseum.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
