Remove EvidenceVsFaith

[Edwardo Piet]

Not only have you stated this opinion three times in two posts regardless of the fact that nobody has responded to it,

I'm just trying to make sure I get my point across because I'm quite often misunderstood. I try not to backtrack so much but it tends to happen to some extent even when I try not to.

you've also gone about doing so with no regard for logic. It does not follow logically that because someone has more posts they'll have a higher percentage off spam and nonsense.

I just said that if you have more posts it is on the whole more likely probably.

E.G: If I had only 100 posts there would of course be less spam simply because there's less posts.

Not only have you made this point four times in two posts, you've once again failed to recognise the point. It does not reflect well on the community if you are spamming useless crap in threads,

I don't believe I am 'spamming useless crap', I'm doing my best to get my point across. It's one thing to know what you want to explain and another to explain it. I often have trouble explaining it so that I am fully understood, so to make sure I am fully understood I give different versions until my point is understood. Because it's hard for me to be sure which 'version' is best. It's the way I write - if I try to write otherwise, nothing comes out. I am trying to improve anyway though (I'm always trying to improve overall) - and I believe I am slowly progressing, although in the short-run I may go back a bit sometimes (or stay around the same are).

and a moderator certainly should absolutely never be contributing to the derailing of a thread.

I don't believe I contribute to it derailing? It is simply that when it has already gone off-topic somewhat, already 'derailed' I respond to the derailing since it seems unoffical policy to not lock threads around here(?)

You adopt a "I'm not the only one doing it" attitude, which once again misses the point - you're supposed to have risen above such poor behaviour

Like I said, threads don't tend to get locked here, so if the thread has already derailed and drifted off-topic too much then I don't think I'm exactly making it worse by responding. It's very open here, you can always create a new thread when old threads have died.

My point with the 'not the only one doing it' is that if someone also 'does this', 'fluff posts' or whatever - if they're got hundreds off less posts than me then even if they 'fluff' just as regularly there would be a lot less 'fluff' simply because they post less.

For example: Hypothetically speaking - If had a million posts and 2000 fluffs...then the 2000 fluff posts would only be a tiny percentage...but if everyone else had like 100 posts and they were all fluffs then even though they fluffed 100% of the time (at least up to that point) they would obviously not have 'fuffed' as much as me but that doesn't mean they're less of a 'fluffer' because they would have fluffed 100% of the time whilst I would have done only a tiny percentage, so I don't really fluff much at all.

Just to demonstrate my point that if you have more posts and fluff a bit - there's still going to be a lot of 'fluffs' simply because you have that many posts.

you are a representative of this forum and visitors to the board (myself included) will respond very negatively to seeing such a free-flowing stream of crap pouring from a super moderators mouth.

I don't think everyone at least, sees it that way - so that's simply an opinion.

I'll of course just leave it to the admins to decide.

I could go on, but I think the point has been well demonstrated.

And the point is? I should be reprimanded for 'being EvF' is that the point - IOW: what rule have I exactly broke?

Now - if it is just that I am to be stripped of being a mod then that's of course totally up to the rest of the staff. I mean, if what you are saying is true - then I wonder why it hadn't been done ages ago if I'm really such a problem? Have they just been completely oblivious to it(?) Or just not wanted to tell me for some reason(?) Lol.

And why was I made a mod in the first place, and kept that way if later they realized I'm 'not up to it'(?), or whatever.

So I think, either 1. They don't (or at the very least, all of them don't) see it the way you do, Bef, or 2. They have been completely oblivious to my 'bad behavior' until you have 'informed them' right here or whatever, or 3. They've not wanted to tell me for some unknown reason?

Or... 4. Maybe you can think of an alternative?

EvF