You see the thing is, I don't think I 'fluff post' particularly a lot.
Like I have said - If I do it just a bit that's still going to be a lot of 'fluff posts' simply because I (comparatively) have so many posts.
I don't know whether you've noticed but I've got absolute tons of posts when I'm arguing/debating with someone.
And as for deleting my repeatings of myself - I am improving and trying to do that...the difficulty is doing it whilst making sure I don't delete the best version(s) and have it come out actually worse than if I'd just kept another version or two in (because demonstrating the point is actually less effective if the version I have is ineffective).
And for the record on insulting, I can't speak for others - but I myself never insulted Bef, correct? No ad homs whatsoever?
If there are any then it would have slipped in accidentally - but I doubt there are any at all!
EvF
EDIT: Also - I think when someone has a lot of posts then it is easier to think they have been spamming. As I have said - if one does 'fluff post' then more posts would equate to more 'fluff posting' (because one 'fluff posts' at least to some extent).
I think some may be surprised out of the near 3000 posts I've done exactly how many are reasonably large posts in response to what others have said? (Or as an opening post for one of my own threads - look at one of my threads - I do a lot of arguing there for instance).
My free will thread for instance, and on the marriage threads (particularly one of them, where I had to double-post because my post was too big for one post (and it was all arguments not a massive spam post)).
EvF
Like I have said - If I do it just a bit that's still going to be a lot of 'fluff posts' simply because I (comparatively) have so many posts.
I don't know whether you've noticed but I've got absolute tons of posts when I'm arguing/debating with someone.
And as for deleting my repeatings of myself - I am improving and trying to do that...the difficulty is doing it whilst making sure I don't delete the best version(s) and have it come out actually worse than if I'd just kept another version or two in (because demonstrating the point is actually less effective if the version I have is ineffective).
And for the record on insulting, I can't speak for others - but I myself never insulted Bef, correct? No ad homs whatsoever?
If there are any then it would have slipped in accidentally - but I doubt there are any at all!
EvF
EDIT: Also - I think when someone has a lot of posts then it is easier to think they have been spamming. As I have said - if one does 'fluff post' then more posts would equate to more 'fluff posting' (because one 'fluff posts' at least to some extent).
I think some may be surprised out of the near 3000 posts I've done exactly how many are reasonably large posts in response to what others have said? (Or as an opening post for one of my own threads - look at one of my threads - I do a lot of arguing there for instance).
My free will thread for instance, and on the marriage threads (particularly one of them, where I had to double-post because my post was too big for one post (and it was all arguments not a massive spam post)).
EvF
