Quote:If I do it just a bit that's still going to be a lot of 'fluff posts' simply because I (comparatively) have so many posts.I think Bef explained this and you missed the point entirely. Saying "I have a lot of posts so I am going to have a lot of fluff posts" is not a good argument because it uses absolute amounts rather than relative amounts.
Your argument goes (and correct me if I'm wrong) that person A with 100 posts might have 1 fluff post, and person B with 1000 posts might have 10 fluff posts, so person B has more fluff posts because he has more actual posts. This is true, but is not a good argument because both people have the "fluff ratio" of 1:100.
Now say person B had 1000 posts and 50 fluff posts. You could make the same argument that he has more fluff posts because he has more actual posts, but as you see it doesn't stand up. Person B now has a "fluff ratio" of 1:20. In other words he has more fluffs relative to the amount of actual posts than person A.
The point Bef was trying to make was that people like Eilonnwy have a very small fluff ratio, whilst you have a larger fluff ratio. Amount of posts doesn't come into it.
Anyway, I agree, this discussion has got out of hand. We might just take Eilonnwy's suggestion of more mods, and then have some mod training or whatever.
