You yet again miss the point.
If you post more decent posts than fluff posts, you will have a better ratio.
Anyway, I would categorize what you said above as a fluff post. You repeated your arguments again and again. Here are a few examples:
Just try and write in a manner which is easy to understand and not repetitive. Read over your posts before you submit them (read them out loud) and see if they read well. If they don't, then take out the bits that cause the problem.
Oh, and when I said this: "EvF is quite possibly the only person who could win an argument just by typing so much the other person loses interest in the entire topic", I didn't mean it as a compliment. You shouldn't be proud of the fact that you can win arguments by simple writing pages of random thoughts that cause people to lose all interest in the debate.
Quote:Someone who has 10 million posts and has 1000 'fluff posts' and someone else like "Wow....1000 'fluff posts' - what a spammer!" - but relatively speaking - that's nothing!!But what we're saying is that relatively, you have a lot of fluff posts. As for the ratio averaging out, it really shouldn't if you actually post decent stuff.
If you post more decent posts than fluff posts, you will have a better ratio.
Anyway, I would categorize what you said above as a fluff post. You repeated your arguments again and again. Here are a few examples:
Quote:But my point was that it is of course relative
Quote:My point is that it is indeed relative.
Quote:So the fact I have absolutely more 'fluff posts' (simply because I have so many posts) doesn't mean I have relatively a lot - it may just look like I have 'a lot' (relatively) because I have so many posts.
Quote:So the fact I have many 'fluff posts' does not imply that I do it a lot if it's actually relatively a small(/er) amount, it's simply still absolutely a lot because I have 3000 posts
Quote:No my point is that the fact I have absolutely a lot of fluffs doesn't mean I have a high fluff ratio
Just try and write in a manner which is easy to understand and not repetitive. Read over your posts before you submit them (read them out loud) and see if they read well. If they don't, then take out the bits that cause the problem.
Oh, and when I said this: "EvF is quite possibly the only person who could win an argument just by typing so much the other person loses interest in the entire topic", I didn't mean it as a compliment. You shouldn't be proud of the fact that you can win arguments by simple writing pages of random thoughts that cause people to lose all interest in the debate.
