RE: Christchurch mosque shootings: the heartbreaking hearing
August 27, 2020 at 12:00 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2020 at 12:02 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(August 27, 2020 at 8:09 am)WinterHold Wrote:(August 27, 2020 at 7:06 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Wait, you think I'm excusing him for what he did on the basis of mental illness? Nothing could be further from the truth. Sorry, mate, but shooting 91 innocent people who had never harmed him in any way is manifestly NOT the act of a sane person. Being sane, stable and rational would cause you to reject the ideology that tells you to shoot people in a mosque. Or to cut the heads off of murderers.
And a court appearance for sentencing is not a trial. Tennent pleaded guilty, no trial took place. His court appearances were 'hearings', not 'trials'.
Boru
So as the ISIS militants and Osama bin Laden, but you never call them insane. You call them "terrorists" and never use the mental illness card to justify their acts, like you did to justify the act of this white "totally sane" terrorist.
The last I heard; the name of the formal "anti-terrorism campaign" was not the "anti-insanity campaign".
You can't mask the truth. And just like anti-Islam showed its ugly face, it will keep showing it again and again and soon you will run out of mirages.
Soon enough many will follow the footsteps of New Zealand in combating this cancer.
Actually, I DO refer to Islamic terrorists as ‘insane’ - I think all terrorists are off their trolley. And I don’t use mental illness to ‘justify’ anyone’s terrorist acts.
I’m hardly to be held responsible for what labels governments stick on their fights against terrorists.
I would like nothing more than for Muslim majority countries to follow in our footsteps lock up terrorists for life, with no possibility of parole. I’d like it because that’s what civilized countries do.
I’ll add this new apology you owe me to the list.
Boru