RE: Christchurch mosque shootings: the heartbreaking hearing
August 28, 2020 at 8:13 am
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2020 at 8:14 am by Mister Agenda.)
(August 27, 2020 at 11:29 am)WinterHold Wrote: Since when the rightist white-supremacist movement is not considered a large group ?
Also, ISIS enthusiasts practiced solo crimes, yet it was immediately counted as "terrorism" without question, even though they weren't really with ISIS; just enthusiasts.
It depends on the size of the group, White Supremacy is not monolithic, it contains large groups and small groups. If the particular group that the individual is involved with is not taking violent action and one member takes it on themselves to put rhetoric into practice, that's a disturbed individual who is vulnerable to being incited to violence over the internet AND a terrorist. A 'terror enthusiast' is still a terrorist, as the NZ mosque shooter is. The NZ mosque shooter is a terrorist and ALSO mentally disturbed, like Dylan Roof. Terrorists without terrorist ties who fantasize about being part of ISIS would also fall under the category of mentally disturbed terrorist. Tarrant was given the harshest punishment allowed under NZ law, what more do you want?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.