RE: Christchurch mosque shootings: the heartbreaking hearing
September 1, 2020 at 2:59 am
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2020 at 3:03 am by WinterHold.)
(August 31, 2020 at 11:00 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(August 31, 2020 at 10:31 am)WinterHold Wrote: The topic is about the Christchurch mosque terrorist attack commit by a "white supremacist terrorist".
But you got stuck in an infinite loop of converting it to Islamic terrorism. You are obsessed and stuck in a loop. The obsessive repeating you are doing is telling me one thing: you can't even believe your eyes that non-Muslim terrorists exist. Wake up, the 9/11 era and the anti-Muslim wave is long overdue for retirement.
I was responding specifically to Deese’s post.
I know exactly who was responsible for the slaughter in Christchurch. He was an Islamophobic white supremacist and the people he killed and injured did nothing - absolutely NOTHING - to deserve what happened to them. You get no argument from me on that score.
I’ve had more experience with white, non-Muslim terrorists than you can possibly imagine, so kindly fuck off.
You do realize that terror attacks by Muslim extremists are still taking place, right? And that the harm caused by their earlier attacks still lingers, right?
I don’t deny that there’s a lot of unwarranted anti-Muslim sentiment in the world - no rational person could deny that. But there’s nothing wrong with anti-terrorist sentiment. ‘I hate Muslims because they’re all terrorists’ is an indefensible, idiotic statement. ‘I hate terrorists whether or not they’re Muslims’ is perfectly reasonable.
Boru
Attacks by Muslim extremists thin out when we observe just a single massacre from the other side.
Talking about Islamic terrorism when you are faced by a white non-Muslim terrorism is running from that truth.
Repeating that over and over means just one thing: you want us to stop looking at the terrorism of non-Muslims like the terrorist Tarrant and keep repeating the anti-Muslim propaganda over and over. Cheap if you ask me.