(June 10, 2009 at 4:23 pm)LukeMC Wrote:(June 10, 2009 at 3:56 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: For the point, in response the Luke's 'fluff' response to him quoting my 'fluffs': I ask the same quesiton....when I am yet to get an answer!
I'd love to enlighten you, but as I said, I was only quoting for the lols/fluffs. I'm just too lazy to read your longer posts, I have no criticism to make.
That's ok I'm aware of that ':p'
Oh damn - was that a 'fluff'? What was the alternative? Ignoring what LukeMC said to me? Perhaps I should have done that instead. What an awful, awful, terrible 'fluff' how unproductive to respond when 'unnecessary' to clarify that I hadn't misunderstood Luke - and the smiley! Now that was just totally 'unnecessary'! - Lots of things are 'unnecessary'. Swearing is unnecessary for example. But unless it's an Ad Hom - what the fuck's wrong with it?
EvF