(September 7, 2020 at 2:19 am)SUNGULA Wrote:Quote:You said a couple of pages ago that it wasn't smart for the first person to try to grab his gun,It wasn't
Quote: but that it wasn't wrong either.It wasn't
Quote: It most certainly was wrong,It wasn't
Quote: because if they hadn't done it, they'd likely still be alive,No he's dead because Rittenhouse was there and shot him
Quote: as would the second person that he shot.No he's dead because Rittenhouse was there and shot him
Quote:If they thought based on his demenor that he might shoot someone, then you get the heck out of dodge.Or you confront him before he kills someone
Quote: You don't grab at a firearm. That's suicide.You do if the alternative is letting a potential killer wander around threatening people
Quote:If he pointed the gun at the person for no reason, and in the heat of the moment they tried to take it, I'd be on that guys side.Rittenhouse was intimidating people with his gun and that's a fact
Quote:If the others weren't chasing him and trying to knock him out, I'd be on their side as well, but that doesn't appear to be what happened.They chased him because they were sick of his shit and the pussy run because his tough guy routine backfired
Quote:You don't get to grab someone's gun just because you see them as intimidating.You do if he's using it to intimidate people and you believe he's a threat .
So giving him a legit reason to shoot you is better than letting him walk around threatening people? Threats are just threats. No one needs to die because of a threat. And basically anyone open carrying a gun can be seen as intimidating, depending on who you ask. When all the pro gun people have their open carry rallies, they are called intimidating and compared to terrorists and called far right gun nuts. But guess what almost never happens at those rallies? Shots are almost never fired. I wonder why that is? It's almost like it's safer having all those guns around, being carried out in the open.
