Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse

[Angrboda]

Um, what?

I was responding to the charge i fell afoul of the generic fallacy . Which i pointed out  simply pointing out fire arms were military in nature does not do .And the wiki article answers your statement doubting if that fact was true .

First of all, it's the 'genetic' fallacy, not the 'generic' fallacy. And second, there was no charge that you had fallen afoul of it. I asked if you could make an argument from the fact you noted without running afoul of the genetic fallacy because if you can't, then none of your conclusions from that fact are valid and any conclusions that you draw are non sequiturs. I'm not even claiming that you can't make such an argument. I simply challenged you to do so. Instead, we get this nonsense in reply from you. Is English your first language, or is there a language barrier here that I am unaware of there being?