RE: Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
September 11, 2020 at 4:42 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2020 at 4:47 pm by Irreligious Atheist.)
(September 11, 2020 at 3:22 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:Quote: I don't like how Zimmerman followed him either, but contrary to what has been said over and over, the police did not instruct Zimmerman not to follow Trayvon, he broke no laws in doing so, and he was allowed to be carrying a gun.
The 911 dispatcher told him not too and breaking no laws does not mean what he did was not wrong nor can any sane person call it self defense
Quote: And as far as the anti-gun arguments go, that's pretty much out the window now that you have rioters on the street burning businesses down, rioters marching through rural neighbourhoods scaring children and screaming for people to get out of their homes and into the streets, breaking into gated communities and threatening to kill people and their dogs and burn their houses down, dragging random people out of their cars and beating them almost to death, mobs beating up trans women on the streets, BLM supporters shooting and killing black children for crossing barriers that they put up. The anti-gun argument has no leg to stand on any more.Typical pro gun fox news level fear mongering . Nope this doesn't affect the argument in the least .
Sorry that I care about trans women, black children, black adults, children being woken up in their sleep by angry mobs, innocent people who did nothing wrong having their livelihoods taken from them when their businesses are burned down. How right wing of me. I'm sure the corporate media promoting this shit and billionaires funding BLM have the people's best interests at heart. I'm glad you put your trust in billionaires and the establishment when they propagate all of this just because they tell you "We're the ones that care about black lives and anyone that opposes our agenda are racist meanies."
(September 11, 2020 at 4:39 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(September 11, 2020 at 4:33 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Hunting? The most likely scenario is he thought Trayvon was acting suspicious and could be involved in robberies, so he wanted to stay near him to point him out to the police when they got there. I wouldn't exactly call that hunting. I don't condone Zimmerman following him, but he broke no law in doing so.
Horseshit what? If it was against the law for Zimmerman to follow Martin, why didn't the dispatcher just tell him to not follow him straight up?
Horseshit that you’re attempting to create a difference between ‘we don’t need you to do that’ and ‘don’t do that’.
Boru
There is a big difference, and maybe that's because he was not doing anything illegal by following him. Maybe that's why they didn't tell him not to follow.
I'm not the one being dishonest because I'm saying exactly what the dispatcher said. I don't need to switch a bunch of words around to try to make the false claim that he was told not to follow, because he was never told that.
