RE: The jarjar binks of a movie
November 3, 2020 at 9:10 pm
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2020 at 9:12 pm by vulcanlogician.)
(November 3, 2020 at 10:53 am)tackattack Wrote: Jarjar is to starwars as wesly crusher is to ST: TNG
I would also posit that pavlov chekov is to Start Trek is a binks
I disagree with you here. Chekov isn't a Binks. Chekov says his line, gives the viewer important information, then bam. He fades into the background. Jarjar is just annoying. And he doesn't fade into the background. He just says annoying things that seldom contribute to the narrative.
Wesley Crusher wasn't a bad character either, he just wasn't given a purpose. The way TNG ended the storyline of his character wasn't good. He should have become a Starfleet officer. As linear and predictable as that makes his character development sound, it would have been better than the path the writers went with. Regardless, Wesley Crusher isn't a Binks.
(November 3, 2020 at 8:55 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:(November 3, 2020 at 8:33 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: You know who was worse than Neelix? TuvixAgreed
I've had nightmares about Tuvix.