(November 1, 2011 at 4:41 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Solipsism isn't pointless; it's entirely accurate. We can't prove anything outside our own minds, because we experience everything through our own minds.
Philosophical solipsism is too often confused with metaphysical solipsism.
Far from interested as I am... What gives you the idea that it's entirely accurate? Mind describing it?
As I've heard it defined previously... It is tripe. And it only becomes less sound the further they stretch it into metaphysics. It might well be that solipsism as you define it (and minus shit like I think therefore i am and if a tree falls in the Forrest does it make a sound) is quite accurate.
And I admit spite for solipsism due to the arguments Ive heard from them in the past. And a personal disgust for Renee Descartes.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
