(November 2, 2011 at 7:12 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: What you arbitrarily find more or less likely is irrelevant. What I said happened is what happened.Well, I say "bullshit". I'll let others judge for themselves.
Quote:Your inability to justify such thing has helped me find it.I've disproved TAG already. It's not hard.
TAG
1. Without Yahweh, there is no absolute standard for morality (bare assertion fallacy).
2. Absolute standards for morality exist. (bare assertion)
3. Therefore Yahweh exists. (conclusion based on bare assertions)
Quote:Quote:Moral justice can't allow for the innocent to take the place of the guilty in punishment, even if the innocent were willing.
According to whom?
So you think moral justice can involve someone innocent volunteering to take the place of the guilty in punishment?
Quote:See above for an example.Quote: For a religion that claims the copyright on morality, it sure is morally bankrupt on even the simplest issues.
According to whom?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
