(November 3, 2011 at 3:14 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: So you are calling me a liar because you don’t like what I said happened? That’s pretty convenient.No, I'm calling you a liar because I don't believe what you said happened.
Quote:This is not TAG but the Moral Argument for God’s existence, which is one I have not used.Variation on the same theme. Same counter argument applies. These are bare assertions on one topic used to prove something in a completely unrelated topic.
Quote:Really?Quote:So you think moral justice can involve someone innocent volunteering to take the place of the guilty in punishment?Yes.
So if the government announced today that there would be a new policy of allowing friends or relatives to take the place of convicted criminals in their punishment, allowing said convicted criminals to go free, you'd support that?
Quote:Can you prove to me that humans cannot naturally fly?You can't prove a negative.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
