(November 3, 2011 at 8:40 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: [Statler uses appeal to ridicule by strawmanning my argument]It was not a straw man, it was an valid analogy. You attempted to refute TAG (Argument A) by refuting the Moral Argument for the Existence of God (Not Argument A), and then to top it off you defended this action rather than admitting it was a major logical misstep. I find it interesting that when VOID points this error out to you your response is something like, “oh yeah my bad”, but when I point it out to you somehow I am the one being logically fallacious. If it were not so sad it’d be funny.
Quote:Why not? You just said you consider it morally acceptable.
If the replacement is innocent I do.
Quote:No.
Why not? You very clearly stated that you cannot prove a negative, and yet you believe the negative statement that “no human can naturally fly” is true?
