(March 4, 2021 at 8:29 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(March 4, 2021 at 8:09 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: At this point, I’m suspecting the name “The We The People Act” might be what disturbs him, that it doesn’t say what exactly is in the Bill, even though the contents and summaries thereof are readily available online. And it’s worth noting that of what I’ve found, the most substantive criticism against it is the fact that its voting provisions threaten to end any hope of Republican dominance because if not for voter suppression laws, there’d be no chance they’d get anywhere. And they’ve flat-out admitted this BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT A COUPLE DAYS AGO.
Then again, I wouldn’t be surprised if the mere fact that it is proposed legislation at all is what’s perturbing him. Not even anything in it. He’s demonstrated his views are getting that far off the grid.
At this point you might re- read the OP...
The.pandering name IS my point.....
But that’s just silly. The Patriot Act set off alarm bells because of the content, not the name. The We The People act is pretty innocuous, both in content and intent.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax