(March 17, 2021 at 12:48 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:(March 17, 2021 at 12:44 pm)Brian37 Wrote: It is related to firearms like it or not, firearms are what he used, regardless of his motive or legal status to buy them.Maybe it's mostly Asian women that work there.
But, I would agree that his dad being holy person, and being deeply indoctrinated, probably taught him that sex is evil.
I would however argue why target Asian women and the place they work if you were not targeting them? I think he had a leaning for Asian women but couldn't take rejection from women in general.
And yea, prayer was not working which was why he turned to firearms.
Once again, I am not arguing about guns with you....full fucking stop.
This was breaking news that started out being presented as a hate crime. Now, as with most breaking news, more information has been revealed and it may not have been a hate crime. Get a fucking grip you wing nut.
I am arguing guns because that is what he used.
I am a "wing nut"?
How? I am crazy for wanting less firearm violence and not more? Is it crazy to look at our allies like Australia and New Zealand and Japan and ask "Why can't we reduce our firearm violence to their levels"? That makes me crazy how?
You are focused on motive, and unfortunately far to much of media, even liberal media focuses on that. It isn't that it isn't important from a case by case basis, it is. But the long term picture has always been access, regardless of motive.
If a person blows their partner's brains out over jealousy, it still remains they had access to a firearm. If a person blows their partner's brains out to avoid a divorce and paying alimony, it is still an access issue. If a person blows their neighbor's brains out over drugs, it is still an access issue. If a person blows their partner's brains out to get life insurance, it is still an access issue. If a person blows their bosses brains out because they got fired, it is still an access issue. If a person blows someone's brains out because they cant get a woman, it is still an access issue. If a person blows someone's brains out because they don't like their skin color, or religion, again, it is an access issue.
"Motive" only speaks about intent, it does not address access.