RE: Mass shooter targets spas.
March 17, 2021 at 1:08 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2021 at 1:10 pm by onlinebiker.)
(March 17, 2021 at 1:03 pm)Brian37 Wrote:"An access issue"?(March 17, 2021 at 12:48 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Maybe it's mostly Asian women that work there.
Once again, I am not arguing about guns with you....full fucking stop.
This was breaking news that started out being presented as a hate crime. Now, as with most breaking news, more information has been revealed and it may not have been a hate crime. Get a fucking grip you wing nut.
I am arguing guns because that is what he used.
I am a "wing nut"?
How? I am crazy for wanting less firearm violence and not more? Is it crazy to look at our allies like Australia and New Zealand and Japan and ask "Why can't we reduce our firearm violence to their levels"? That makes me crazy how?
You are focused on motive, and unfortunately far to much of media, even liberal media focuses on that. It isn't that it isn't important from a case by case basis, it is. But the long term picture has always been access, regardless of motive.
If a person blows their partner's brains out over jealousy, it still remains they had access to a firearm. If a person blows their partner's brains out to avoid a divorce and paying alimony, it is still an access issue. If a person blows their neighbor's brains out over drugs, it is still an access issue. If a person blows their partner's brains out to get life insurance, it is still an access issue. If a person blows their bosses brains out because they got fired, it is still an access issue. If a person blows someone's brains out because they cant get a woman, it is still an access issue. If a person blows someone's brains out because they don't like their skin color, or religion, again, it is an access issue.
"Motive" only speaks about intent, it does not address access.
How exactly are you going to stop someone from having access to a gun and continue to sell them?
Someone COULD buy a gun and not use it illegally for 30 or 40 YEARS. .
I know - your crystal ball - right?
(March 17, 2021 at 1:07 pm)Angrboda Wrote:(March 17, 2021 at 1:01 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Wouldn' t it just be a hate crime against sex workers rather than Asians? Or is that not covered by statute?
I believe you need to be a protected class for it to be a hate crime.
Hmmmm. Seems a pretty uneven application of the law.....
I thought we were trying to end that......
Oh well..