(March 30, 2021 at 5:56 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Analytic naturalists also think that moral whatsits are like centimeters or inches. Exactly like them.
I'm not familiar. So then what separates Analytic Naturalists from Plato or G.E. Moore who say "goodness is a concept that can (and must be?) understood on its own. And once you understand goodness itself, THEN you make moral judgments about reality in relation to that concept.
I guess what I'm asking is, what makes an analytic naturalist a naturalist?
