[Serious] Moral Obligations toward Possible Worlds

[Angrboda]

I may be failing to properly communicate.  I do think that killing is morally significant harm.  There's no split there in the type of morality I try (and mostly fail) to practice.

You were asking about systems that considered the act of killing your father in an act of assisted suicide and killing someone else by accident are the same harm.  Natural realism could (and does) do this.

Do you acknowledge that unnecessary harm is more morally repugnant than necessary harm?