Any Moral Relativists in the House?

[vulcanlogician]

Given the early hour and that I've only had two cups of coffee, I reserve the right to deny that I said any of the above.

So I have the other problem. I'm fueled by quite a few espressos. So maybe we should discuss Rachels's "less caffeinated" version of the argument. There's also a Boghossian lecture that I'm drawing from that directly argues my thesis. I may rewatch it and try to reproduce some of his better points.

For now, I would specifically like to hear Nudger's opinion on Rachels's calling nonsequiteur on the provided relativist argument. Doesn't that at least somewhat speak to my point?