RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 11:00 am
(This post was last modified: June 3, 2021 at 11:04 am by Drich.)
(June 2, 2021 at 4:46 pm)Fireball Wrote: As I said, there wasn't an invitation. You got offered help when your shit failed. I can actually understand why you would think that was an invitation, i.e., those two neurons. Oh, look, evidence of a sock account, right here in your words. Then, you got banned for SPAM. I notice that you didn't respond to that item, but I get it.
hey dummy.. quote number 1 IS AN INVITATION. IT is a solicitation to join the members of the defunct 'thinking atheist' on a new website. I would have never know or known to join. nor been allowed to join as per the admission that my name and avatar had been banned from my previous time with the thinking atheist. So not only was i invited I was also unban so i could join. Can't you see i would have never been apart of that forum if the admin did not want me there. I never heard of it until i was told of it, and i could not join even if i had heard and wanted to join as my credentials were pre banned.
(June 2, 2021 at 7:55 pm)Fireball Wrote:(June 2, 2021 at 5:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Moderator Notice
Posting the contents of private correspondence with other members is not allowed.
Sure am glad I'm not the one doing it. That banning was out in the open for all denizens of the site to see to see, in their ban log...and I never mentioned where it happened, either. He's got multiple priors, though.
So we went from i was never invited to everything was out in the open..
So which rule did i break? beside upsetting the patrons?