Noteworthy News

[brewer]

Scientists making claims that have been determined to be bad/false science should be allowed to continue making the claims because their scientists?

They can make their claims all they want, just not violate a private businesses rules.

It is not bad science though. There have been studies showing plenty of benefits to using Ivermectin, and it is not a dangerous drug. There is very little risk in taking it, even if it doesn't work for that person. It's all about money and profits. That's why positive talk of the drug is being censored.

Do you even know the specifics of the situation I am talking about, or are you just assuming it is bad science because the powers that be have deemed it so? Look into it for yourself before you go and call it bad science and call for a return to the dark ages where scientists and doctors are punished for speaking out.

Show me the study. It's bad science to push a drug onto an unknowing public until approved or in an advanced clinical trial. I suppose you could point to compassionate use but that is not what is being advocated.

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.n...vermectin/

Most drugs have dangers: https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/pr...ed-animals

The same thing was said about about hydroxychloroquine and oleander extract. How'd that turn out.

What does an evolutionary biologist have to contribute to medicine? Send me his CV and we'll compare that to, let say, an MD or biochemist.

The problem is you think infotainment = science. It does not.