RE: Global warming: Are we doomed? A poll.
July 2, 2021 at 11:39 am
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2021 at 11:42 am by WinterHold.)
(July 2, 2021 at 10:35 am)Brian37 Wrote:(July 2, 2021 at 10:20 am)WinterHold Wrote: We are not an "invasive" specie. We have a brain and a choice to be moderate in everything, actually all of us humans know that "overdoing anything" is a source of disasters.
Second, when males "sponsor the female + any child resulting from their intercourse", with both parties of the relationship agreeing to a "contract of rights and obligations each should do" through the relationship; stating what "both parties should do and not do"; that is called "civilized, human relationship" that protects both the female, the children that might result from the relationship and solves most problems the couple might have before they even happen!
But if you throw that behind you and choose to be a "non-civilized" creature that doesn't obey contracts, the relationship turns into something from the animal world; something not human that causes disasters like Global Warming.
YES WE ARE AN INVASIVE SPECIES.
Having bigger brains, and a more complex language does not preclude us from exploitation of resources. It does not preclude us from ignoring the damage of the environment that we depend on sustaining us.
We are the only species on the face of the planet that has created a garbage dump in the ocean which is the size of the state of Texas. We are the only species capable of affecting the climate to the point it affects weather, and our resources.
Fuck your "contract" bullshit. Women are not secondary to men. Women are EQUAL to men and in many cases they do better than men. I would be living on the streets today if it were not for the lifetime of work my late mother did to save for me. I never moved up economically. My entire life I depended on her. I am not ashamed of saying that.
"Contracts" are not gender based. Mutual agreement is not wrong, and gender should have nothing to do with it. If a women is the breadwinner, or a woman is the leader of a family, or even head of state, tell me, why would you have a problem with that?
There is a huge difference between "what I am" and "what I can do".
eg: being "invasive" is a choice; and what makes you take the decision to "act invasively" or to "act non aggressively" is your brain ! if you want to freeze it I will have to take you down from the "human being" rank.
Nobody said women are secondary to men.
What's wrong again about sitting with "the woman I want to marry" and write down together how we want to treat each other?