(July 3, 2021 at 4:53 am)Nomad Wrote:(July 1, 2021 at 9:26 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: From two years ago:
Source
From seven years ago:
Source
It took me mere minutes to find these and they aren't the only ones. Unlike cold fusion, CCS is already here and functioning.
Websites clearly pushing cc&s aren't very persuasive. They're shilling.
Edit to add: For fucks sake the first website doesn't even have an author. That's Phil Morris "doctors say ghat smoking doesn't cause cancer" level propoganda right off the bat.
You don't like the sources? Ok. How bout Oxford Academic? Or maybe Reuters?
Regardless, any of the links I've provided prove your initial claim false.
(July 1, 2021 at 8:23 am)Nomad Wrote: ...a bit like cold fusion, theoretically possible, but practically unworkable.(my bold)
The technology is not just theoretically possible, but already in use. A far cry from your comparison to cold fusion. Perhaps you're complaint is that there isn't enough in use yet, and I would wholeheartedly agree. But, that wasn't your claim.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.