Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 2, 2025, 3:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
James Webb
#17
RE: James Webb
(August 9, 2021 at 2:03 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(August 9, 2021 at 1:35 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote: I'm most interested in observations of extra-solar planets.  However, even Webb isn't going to be able to see earth-like planets or measure their atmosphere.  That will likely require LUVOIR or a set of space-based telescopes doing interferometry.

depends on what you mean by “see”.   dozens of exoplanets have already been directly imaged from the ground.

There are also several additional Hubble scale optical snd near optical space telescopes in the works, scheduled to be launched in the next 5 years.   They either cover different wave length from hubble, or capable of scanning the sky much more quickly than hubble so as to be able to provide full coverage of the sky at bear hubble resolutions.    These are Less flashy than JWST, but perhaps promise work of comparable importance.

habitable exoplanets can only be "seen" through occultation of their star.  This drastically limits the number we will find, and the signal is nowhere nearly large enough for us to measure atmospheres.

Sure, we can directly see some gas giants, especially when around dim stars, but they aren't habitable.  We are able to measure some large-planet atmospheres as well. Perhaps Webb will be able to measure some Titan-like atmospheres, because it is so thick.

To really get to see habitable planets directly, and do atmospheric measurements, we would need something more than what has been proposed.  I saw an idea for an occulting disk, thousands of kilometers from a hubble-size telescope.  That should provide the ability to cut out the starlight and see and measure planets.  I've also seen ideas for multi-telescope interferometry - though I'm not sure those will get the signal-to-noise with only internal star occultation.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
James Webb - by vulcanlogician - August 2, 2021 at 9:03 pm
RE: James Webb - by Astreja - August 2, 2021 at 11:39 pm
RE: James Webb - by Rev. Rye - August 2, 2021 at 11:53 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fake Messiah - August 3, 2021 at 6:06 am
RE: James Webb - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - August 3, 2021 at 6:26 am
RE: James Webb - by The Valkyrie - August 3, 2021 at 6:50 am
RE: James Webb - by popeyespappy - August 3, 2021 at 7:31 am
RE: James Webb - by zebo-the-fat - August 3, 2021 at 1:08 pm
RE: James Webb - by popeyespappy - August 3, 2021 at 2:11 pm
RE: James Webb - by zebo-the-fat - August 3, 2021 at 3:08 pm
RE: James Webb - by popeyespappy - August 3, 2021 at 3:13 pm
RE: James Webb - by HappySkeptic - August 6, 2021 at 12:55 pm
RE: James Webb - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - August 9, 2021 at 6:38 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fake Messiah - October 3, 2021 at 9:56 pm
RE: James Webb - by DocIllinois - August 6, 2021 at 3:01 pm
RE: James Webb - by HappySkeptic - August 9, 2021 at 1:35 pm
RE: James Webb - by Anomalocaris - August 9, 2021 at 2:03 pm
RE: James Webb - by HappySkeptic - August 9, 2021 at 3:54 pm
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - August 9, 2021 at 3:47 pm
RE: James Webb - by Anomalocaris - August 9, 2021 at 5:23 pm
RE: James Webb - by Peebo-Thuhlu - October 4, 2021 at 3:36 am
RE: James Webb - by Jackalope - October 4, 2021 at 4:48 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fireball - October 4, 2021 at 6:25 pm
RE: James Webb - by Jackalope - October 4, 2021 at 6:50 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fireball - October 4, 2021 at 7:54 pm
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - October 4, 2021 at 10:23 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fireball - October 4, 2021 at 11:04 pm
RE: James Webb - by AFTT47 - January 9, 2022 at 5:56 pm
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - January 13, 2022 at 1:32 am
RE: James Webb - by ignoramus - January 13, 2022 at 2:25 am
RE: James Webb - by Anomalocaris - January 13, 2022 at 2:34 am
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - January 13, 2022 at 2:38 am
RE: James Webb - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - January 13, 2022 at 4:19 am
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - January 23, 2022 at 7:32 pm
RE: James Webb - by Angrboda - January 24, 2022 at 9:02 pm
RE: James Webb - by brewer - January 24, 2022 at 9:15 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fireball - January 24, 2022 at 9:45 pm
RE: James Webb - by brewer - January 24, 2022 at 11:56 pm
RE: James Webb - by Peebo-Thuhlu - January 25, 2022 at 7:48 am
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - January 29, 2022 at 12:04 am
RE: James Webb - by Anomalocaris - January 29, 2022 at 3:31 pm
RE: James Webb - by Jackalope - January 25, 2022 at 2:10 am
RE: James Webb - by zebo-the-fat - January 25, 2022 at 5:29 am
RE: James Webb - by polymath257 - January 29, 2022 at 4:45 pm
RE: James Webb - by vulcanlogician - January 29, 2022 at 4:55 pm
RE: James Webb - by brewer - January 29, 2022 at 7:18 pm
RE: James Webb - by Anomalocaris - January 29, 2022 at 8:17 pm
RE: James Webb - by brewer - January 29, 2022 at 9:11 pm
RE: James Webb - by Anomalocaris - January 29, 2022 at 6:43 pm
RE: James Webb - by Fireball - January 29, 2022 at 7:54 pm
RE: James Webb - by AFTT47 - January 29, 2022 at 11:36 pm
RE: James Webb - by Disagreeable - January 30, 2022 at 9:53 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  James Webb Space Telescope pics pocaracas 18 4190 December 8, 2022 at 3:00 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  James Webb telescope is live (well, almost)! Jehanne 5 813 March 20, 2022 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Responses to James Tour Gwaithmir 1 863 January 1, 2021 at 2:38 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  James Webb space telescope axed Anomalocaris 29 12384 July 13, 2011 at 2:10 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)