(August 10, 2021 at 7:11 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:It also rests on the faulty assumption that a smaller population will use less. Our current world shows that to be nonesense.(August 10, 2021 at 6:32 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: How about REDUCE DEMAND?So, how are we going to do that, Biker? Because people aren’t getting vasectomies and tubals at a high enough rate to make much of a dent in the world’s population. Plus, the people having the most kids these days are people who tend to be too poor to even have much access to the resources the rest of the world is using up.
Best - surest - and practical way?
Reduce population.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
