RE: Greeting from Vienna...
November 12, 2011 at 7:03 pm
(This post was last modified: November 12, 2011 at 7:17 pm by mayor of simpleton.)
(November 12, 2011 at 6:39 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: Welcome, as an American cyclist could you get me a drug dealers telephone number please?
Another one who likes to believe the newpapers.
If you need a good drug dealer, you'd be better off consulting a professional Hockey Players. Drugs tests are illegal in the NHL. The NFL, NBA and MLB are not too much better.
Cycling has it's problems becuase it actually tests the athletes.
One of my cyclist is the current Austrian National Champion. He was tested 6 times within 17 days during the time of the Nationals. So far this year he was tested 47 times. The past 6 years he's been tested 211 times... he's only 23. Truth is, he is not even nearly the most tested in the sport.
This is not a defense, but simply the empirical evidences I can present, rather than the intuitive opinions that are "spun" in the newpapers, who are indeed in the business of making money for what you read.
If you actually test, you might actually catch someone. Explains why other sports seem to be 'less of a problem'.
If you want to know who all was in Spain by Dr. Fuentes, well lets just say that there were 297 athletes in question... 67 were cyclists... not the majority sport, but the one that makes the headlines.
Do be careful here... such hype is how people get hooked into religions. Not that this would be a problem for you... certainly not.
Hey... I'm not upset or anything. It goes with the territory. Cycling is not so much entertainment for me as it is work.
Meow!
GREG
btw... I know a "dealer", but he is there to let me know what supposed legal supplements are tainted. You'd be surprised to know what illegal stuff can be found on the shelves of WalMart that can get you a two to three year ban. I have to know, as we cannot plead ignorance. If it is in you, it is in you.
Moral is as moral does and as moral wishes it all too be. - MoS
The absence of all empirical evidence for the necessity of intuitive X existing is evidence against the necessary empirical existence of intuitive X - MoS (variation of 180proof)
Athesim is not a system of belief, but rather a single answer to a single question. It is the designation applied by theists to those who do not share their assumption that a god/deity exists. - MoS
I am not one to attribute godlike qualities to things that I am unable to understand. I may never be in the position to understand certain things, but I am not about to create an anthropomorphic deity out of my short-commings. I wish not to errect a monument to my own personal ignorace and demand that others worship this proxy of ego. - MoS
The absence of all empirical evidence for the necessity of intuitive X existing is evidence against the necessary empirical existence of intuitive X - MoS (variation of 180proof)
Athesim is not a system of belief, but rather a single answer to a single question. It is the designation applied by theists to those who do not share their assumption that a god/deity exists. - MoS
I am not one to attribute godlike qualities to things that I am unable to understand. I may never be in the position to understand certain things, but I am not about to create an anthropomorphic deity out of my short-commings. I wish not to errect a monument to my own personal ignorace and demand that others worship this proxy of ego. - MoS
