(September 12, 2021 at 8:30 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:Also, it doesn't address the fact that there is no way in heck that building facilities to house nuclear waste could be more expensive than the billions and billions spent dealing with negative side effects of fossil fuels and no amount of population control is going to make a lick of difference as consumption is not equal to population. That was one of the many mistakes Thomas Malthus overlooked.(September 12, 2021 at 7:54 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: And WHY hasn' t ANY of it been done in 60 damned years? 60 YEARS....
Because - it COSTS MONEY.
Aren't there any other reasons you can think of? What you said (it costs money) is one reason, and I think you're right. This is one of the reasons. But aren't there other reasons too? What are those other reasons?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
