Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 5:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
#1
The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
The net is on fire with rumours of a Higgs boson at 125 GeV. Is this another instance of crying wolf? Hopefully not. Next date on your calendar: Dec 13th.

http://blog.vixra.org/2011/12/02/higgs-r...o-125-gev/

Reply
#2
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
Supersymmetry, that ought to make you happy Joseph.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#3
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
That hurts.
Reply
#4
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
Let's wait and see. Thanks for posting!
"Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power derives from a mandate by the masses, not some farcical aquatic ceremony!"
- Dennis the peasant.
Reply
#5
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
An article in the Guardian, with several prominent physicists commenting on the rumour:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2...boson-real

Reply
#6
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
It looks like the rumour was confirmed, a Higgs boson at 125 GeV, with a 2.8 sigma.

Here's the best graph that includes Atlas+CMS+Tevatron + LEP (from Phil Gibbs)

[Image: globalhiggssignaldec2011lo.png]

Reply
#7
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
I'd wait a while before breaking out the champagne, but it looks promising.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#8
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
Would one of you theoretical physicists types please explain what this might mean to the standard model? Does it lend itself to supersymmetry, or as this post suggests kill it?

If confirmed of course.

From the link in the OP.

Quote:A rumour that reached our comment section suggests that a signal for the Higgs boson has been seen at 125 GeV with 2-3 sigma significance. This would be a great result if confirmed because at this mass the standard model has problems with vacuum stability that are likely to require supersymmetry or something similar to stabilize. If on the other hand the Higgs were at 140 GeV we would be left with a simple but unsatisfying model that could exist without modification up to energies well beyond anything we can explore in man-made experiments. In other words we might never be able to detect anything new. A Higgs that is just 15 GeV lighter is a different story altogether, so theorists will be very happy if that is the answer.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#9
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
(December 2, 2011 at 7:54 pm)little_monkey Wrote: The net is on fire with rumours of a Higgs boson at 125 GeV. Is this another instance of crying wolf? Hopefully not. Next date on your calendar: Dec 13th.

http://blog.vixra.org/2011/12/02/higgs-r...o-125-gev/

That's a blog right there. Thanks for the hook-up. Here's the Lubos perspective. Here's Not Even Wrong weighing in; and last but not least, Tommaso at Science2.0.

Here's a snippet of Tommaso's perspective: I will explain why below, using some of the most important graphs shown by Fabiola Gianotti and Guido Tonelli today; but before I continue, let me tell you why I have stressed "Standard Model" above. A particle which behaves like the Standard Model Higgs, both in the way it is produced and in the way it decays, cannot in my opinion be considered a hint of Supersymmetry just because some of the SUSY theories do predict that the lightest of the 5 or more Higgs particles will behave like a Standard Model Higgs boson!

So, SUSY enthusiasts should remain quiet for the time being, especially since large swaths of parameter space are being directly canceled by the CMS and ATLAS searches -for instance, a 500 GeV gluino is by now almost totally excluded (it remains possible in very specialized and ad-hoc scenarios) and Gordy Kane no later than one year ago was willing to put his money on it.

But let's not divagate. The Higgs. The Higgs (SM) was predicted to be light from the observation of many observable quantities connected to it - dozens of them, to be sure. Most of the precise results of the LEP experiments allowed to fit for the Higgs mass, once supplemented with information on the W and top quark masses. And the answer was unequivocal: the Higgs must be light, most probably below 161 GeV or so (the LEP electroweak working group indicates this in their web page, although it is probably not updated with the most recent information).

So let me now answer the question I posed at the beginning to myself: why do I believe this is firm evidence of the existence of a SM Higgs at 124-126 GeV.

I love this stuff. This is forum denizen Galileo on the "what we lack" thread:

(December 12, 2011 at 11:09 pm)Galileo Wrote: this is exactly what I am talking about.

My friend who was also once religious and I are trying to write music entirely dedicated to concepts of atheism to try and create the same uplifting feeling that religious music does.


that was one of the main reasons I remained a believer so long, to be honest. the music. for a singer, it's amazing. there is no reason we can't have the same though.

I mean, this Higgs stuff... there ain't never been a cathedral that's worth a parking space at CERN; the Holy of Holies produces these kinds of hadith:
[Image: th_iSpy-Run120020Ev2673-rphi-07112009.png]
...and for what? To know us. Wink
(December 13, 2011 at 7:16 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: Would one of you theoretical physicists types please explain what this might mean to the standard model? Does it lend itself to supersymmetry, or as this post suggests kill it?

If confirmed of course.
Of the three links I just posted, Lubos Motl calls himself "the last happy string theorist;" you can be sure he has a tinge of bias for SUSY. Tommaso speaks clearly with a bias against SUSY. If you're into this stuff, Science 2.0 is a hotbed of working scientists; you can see the volleys in the comments to the Tommaso link.

I'm not "in the field;" I'm a naive philosopher. But a Higgs is a kind of "anti-SUSY" in itself. Wink
And looking at that graph up there... this is from the Lubos perspective:
[Image: cms-four-lepton-digamma.JPG?imgmax=400]
[Image: twQdxWW.jpg]
Reply
#10
RE: The Higgs Boson at 125 GeV, or much ado about nothing
(December 13, 2011 at 7:16 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: Would one of you theoretical physicists types please explain what this might mean to the standard model? Does it lend itself to supersymmetry, or as this post suggests kill it?

If confirmed of course.

From the link in the OP.

Quote:A rumour that reached our comment section suggests that a signal for the Higgs boson has been seen at 125 GeV with 2-3 sigma significance. This would be a great result if confirmed because at this mass the standard model has problems with vacuum stability that are likely to require supersymmetry or something similar to stabilize. If on the other hand the Higgs were at 140 GeV we would be left with a simple but unsatisfying model that could exist without modification up to energies well beyond anything we can explore in man-made experiments. In other words we might never be able to detect anything new. A Higgs that is just 15 GeV lighter is a different story altogether, so theorists will be very happy if that is the answer.

There is a controversy about whether the 125 GeV Higgs leads to beyond SM. Peter Voit has an interesting post on that:

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=4262



Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The real something for nothing Spongebob 51 4065 September 14, 2021 at 11:54 am
Last Post: Spongebob
  Creation of universes from nothing. Jehanne 22 2673 November 14, 2018 at 5:46 pm
Last Post: Dr H
  Do W Bosons get Their Mass from the Higgs Field? Rhondazvous 2 806 February 18, 2018 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  In What Way is the Higgs Boaon Unstable? Rhondazvous 4 745 September 15, 2017 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Does the Higgs Boson Give Mass to Other Bosons? Rhondazvous 9 1779 August 3, 2017 at 7:36 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Does the Higgs Boson Enforce the CCosmic Speed Limit Rhondazvous 14 3097 July 24, 2017 at 10:40 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Are Scientists Still Looking for the Higgs Boson? Rhondazvous 24 8248 July 18, 2017 at 4:48 am
Last Post: Alex K
  1964 Penzias/Wilson and Higgs: Coincidence? Confluent Knowledge? Rhondazvous 15 4769 July 8, 2017 at 10:29 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Happy 5th Higgs Day! Alex K 17 5423 July 5, 2017 at 10:38 am
Last Post: Ben Davis
  When Do Quanta Pass Through the Higgs Field? What is a Higgs Boson Before Excitation Rhondazvous 17 4871 June 28, 2017 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)