The real something for nothing

[Rev. Rye]

Also worth noting: it's almost certain that the level of population control required to reduce demand for carbon fuels to a reasonable level (in the absence of doing much of anything else) requires nothing short of a level of multicide that would put Pol "wiped out a third of Cambodia's population" Pot and Adolf "plunged the world into the biggest multicide in history" Hitler to shame. And this is somehow a more viable plan than pivoting from petroleum to nuclear power.

And, as I've mentioned before, the assumption that carbon emissions is directly proportional to population or population growth is fallacious and hinges on the assumption that every country has a comparably high standard of living, the 20 countries with the highest birth rates have a combined rate of carbon emissions at 4% of the US'. And, yes, this is coming from a fellow anti-natalist who acknowledges that this is, honestly a shit argument.