(September 12, 2021 at 9:51 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Also worth noting: it's almost certain that the level of population control required to reduce demand for carbon fuels to a reasonable level (in the absence of doing much of anything else) requires nothing short of a level of multicide that would put Pol "wiped out a third of Cambodia's population" Pot and Adolf "plunged the world into the biggest multicide in history" Hitler to shame. And this is somehow a more viable plan than pivoting from petroleum to nuclear power.As I said Malthusian pipe dreams
And, as I've mentioned before, the assumption that carbon emissions is directly proportional to population or population growth is fallacious and hinges on the assumption that every country has a comparably high standard of living, the 20 countries with the highest birth rates have a combined rate of carbon emissions at 4% of the US'. And, yes, this is coming from a fellow anti-natalist who acknowledges that this is, honestly a shit argument.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


