(September 28, 2021 at 6:01 pm)Spongebob Wrote:(September 28, 2021 at 2:25 am)Nomad Wrote: Look at all the damage Hinkley would have prevented had he succeeded. Ordinary people don't have the malevolent influence on their country that Reagan did in the eight years his regime held the White House.
Well, that's one way to look at it.
(September 27, 2021 at 10:23 pm)Fireball Wrote: My take is that the president is a much more high profile person who attracts a lot more scrutiny and hatred from the general populace, and with mental cases, maybe even more so. The office of president carries a lot of responsibilities that most people in the rest of the population don't. I don't mean to sound dismissive with this, but replacing a duly elected president isn't as easy as replacing yet another citizen who has none of the president's responsibilities, or experiences. We've been recently subjected to an anomalous case where a president getting shot and killed would have most likely been a positive result for the world.
I disagree about the replacement part. The POTUS has a built in backup. In most cases it wouldn't change much if the Pres left and the VP took over for a few years. Trump's case is probably the biggest exception in that opinion.
Sorry for missing this one until now. But in response, we laud Georg Elser.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home