(November 1, 2021 at 3:55 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:What he doesn't get is release is a gradual one that the planet can handle and even in a forest fire the amount released will be easy to handle(October 31, 2021 at 10:16 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: As usual you missed the point entirely.
Trying to sequester carbon in trees is just kicking the can down the road.
Every gram of carbon in a tree will eventually make it right back into the environment when the tree dies.
Even nonstop planting of trees won' t make a difference - you will just make a bigger pile of dead wood in the future.
Yes burying it is not really a viable option - but it is the only scenario that would actually make a long term difference. In order to reduce environmental carbon you need to capture it in something that won' t biodegrade.
...
Waiting for the " you hate trees" idiots to chime in.
What part of ‘cycle’ is giving you trouble? It’s perfectly ok that the carbon stored in trees will eventually be released.
Boru
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
