Is Atheism Dead?

[Angrboda]

No, I can't agree with you on that.  I haven't read his work yet, and I'm not a professional physicist.

You don't need to be a physicist to recognize a logical fallacy. Krauss equivocates by using a misleading a title, and unfortunately for him, plenty of atheists are not intelligent enough to understand its real meaning.

Dumbass, it's only an equivocation if he uses the word nothing in multiple senses in his argument. That you or someone else attaches a different meaning to the word doesn't make it an equivocation. This is why all your bluster about the triumph of theology and death of atheism is nothing more than dust. You're dumber than a sack full of hammers.