RE: Noteworthy News
December 15, 2021 at 12:38 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2021 at 12:44 pm by Irreligious Atheist.)
(December 15, 2021 at 12:27 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(December 15, 2021 at 12:17 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: I defended the justice system which says you're innocent until proven guilty. Nothing more. That's as far as I'm going to go into that because at this point it's a safe bet that writing anything more about that will be purposely misinterpreted to ban me. The fact that I only got 3 minor slaps on the wrist and short timeouts and was not truly banned shows that the accusations made against me were extremely iffy at best. If I had actually ever come close to defending the "r" word, you can bet your ass I'd have been banned for real, in a second, and there wouldn't be multiple posters making the argument in my defense that the bannings were unjustified. I have been posting on different atheist forums for over a decade and a half now, and in that time, I never received even a warning on a forum for breaking any rules, until I ran into one particular mod on here. I behave myself and always follow the rules.
You have a perfectly reasonable take about BLM. It's too bad more people can't just respond in a level headed way like you have here. You disavow what they said about Smollett, but you think that overall the movement is needed, and I agree. Protest is a good thing. Black lives do need to matter more, and I actually think it's a pretty catchy slogan and a good one. I've gotten crap on here for disagreeing with the BLM org though, and Antifa people attempting to burn down court houses. The responses are always "Why are you even bringing this up? You're racist for even mentioning that the BLM org is flawed or that attempting to burn down court houses is bad. Stop playing the victim and bringing up news I'd rather not hear about, etc, etc." And no one can ever actually point out one racist thing they think I've posted. All they can do is say that I like Dave Chappelle so I hate trans people or I find some conservative comic to be entertaining so therefore I am guilty by association. I agree with Vaush that the organization should have been called something different from the actual movement to avoid this mess a bit. And thankfully only 18 % of Americans support the BLM orgs mission to defund the police https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...599232001/ , and that includes 81 % of black Americans, but if you go against defund the police on AF, you are branded as not caring about blacks people's issues. See the issue here? No one can respectfully disagree anymore. Like I posted before, if this thread was meant for only posting negative news about conservatives and anything else is unacceptable, then let's tip the hat to Minimalist and rename the thread "Damned conservatives".
I stole the Q Anon comparison from comedian Andrew Schulz, so credit to him. The culture is clowning the BLM org big time right now. What's more likely? Q-Anon's claims that Bill Clinton got it on with minors, or the BLM orgs insinuation that the police framed Jussie Smollett? They're both pretty bad, I would say. Obviously it's not a one to one comparison saying they are the exact same thing, but the BLM org still continuing to back Smollett as being set up is a massive mistake optically, and shows that leadership is incapable of separating emotion and blind racist allegiance from the evidence at hand.
Funny how you never actually give any quotes of me supposedly being bigoted, but you keep making that claim.
You said Asians and Hispanics are ‘in the white family’. If that’s not bigotry, it’ll do til some comes along.
Boru
How is that racist? Hispanics are in the white family. Millions of them identify as white. What is your issue with that exactly? The word family? Family is racist now? And plenty of Western Asians are half white or even more than half white. They can choose to identify as either Asian, white, or both. This stuff is fluid. And because of their success level, some are no longer grouping Asians in the POC category, and instead are grouping them with whites and measuring their performance in school against POCs and such. Asians and whites are similar in that both groups have a large amount of privilege, and that's why I said technically it's white/Asian privilege, but I'm fine with just narrowing it down to white privilege and calling it that. https://reason.com/2020/11/16/equity-rep...-of-color/