Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 14, 2025, 4:09 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Anti-nuclear bomb?
#16
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb?
(August 15, 2021 at 3:10 pm)WinterHold Wrote: Just for readers of the topic:

https://www.quora.com/What-would-happen-...20material.


Quote:interesting question,
Blackholes are spheres with very very high gravitational force. Even light can not escape that force. So even if the bomb explodes, we won't be able to observe it. Blackholes are made from high density neutron star. You can’t expect a blackhole to be destroyed just by an explosion of neuclear weapon.
Bomb explosion would release a huge amount of energy (assuming it reaches the “surface” of blackhole and explodes). Blackhole treats energy and mass equally. So it will absorb all the energy released by the bomb.
Lets assume we throw the bomb at event horizon. Time is slow there, much much slower then in our normal world. So before the bomb reaches the center, we might have passed 100s or 1000s of earth years. So if you are the person to drop the bomb, you probably wouldn't be the person to observe it when it explodes. Fascinating, isn't it ?

A black hole is how you make atomic bombs get lost for 100s or 1000s of earth years near the hole's event horizon.
Don't believe the misleading posts trying to cover this fact  Tut Tut .

Just a few pesky facts to ruin your day:

 - What the researchers made in the article you cited was not a black hole. It was a black hole analog. That's something that has certain properties that we might expect a black hole to have without being an actual black hole. What was actually produced was a Bose-Einstein condensate made of 8000 super-cooled rubidium atoms. It was so fragile that they destroyed it every time they took a picture of it. Needless to say, this won't be stopping any nukes any time soon.

 - Black holes are not your friend. They are top contenders for the most destructive phenomena ever discovered. The small ones "evaporate" with a detonation that outstrips any bomb that humans have ever conceived of. The mid-sized ones simply swallow the entire planet. The really big ones devour the solar system in one gulp. Do I need to explain why this would be a bad idea?

 - Throwing a nuke into a black hole, or a black hole at a nuke, is one of the more absurd ways of actually making a nuclear bomb worse. Nuclear weapons are relatively inefficient at converting mass to energy, managing only a percent or two at the best of times. By contrast, a black hole can liberate more than 50% of the energy equivalent of any infalling mass. This is how astronomers can study black holes in other galaxies by looking at the gamma radiation that they emit. So your "solution" makes an explosion an order of magnitude larger than the nuke itself would have. And that's just the nuke. Once your black hole started pulling in atmosphere, ocean, and bedrock you'd have real trouble. It would effectively turn any nearby mass into a nuclear explosion.

TL;DR We can't do this and that's a very good thing.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Anti-nuclear bomb? - by WinterHold - August 15, 2021 at 10:59 am
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by onlinebiker - August 15, 2021 at 11:02 am
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by brewer - August 15, 2021 at 11:58 am
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by onlinebiker - August 15, 2021 at 12:11 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - August 15, 2021 at 12:30 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Anomalocaris - August 15, 2021 at 12:31 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by awty - August 15, 2021 at 1:38 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Spongebob - August 15, 2021 at 1:49 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by WinterHold - August 15, 2021 at 3:10 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Fake Messiah - August 15, 2021 at 4:22 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Anomalocaris - August 15, 2021 at 9:28 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by LadyForCamus - February 17, 2022 at 7:49 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Paleophyte - February 19, 2022 at 6:40 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Ferrocyanide - February 20, 2022 at 2:43 am
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Angrboda - August 15, 2021 at 4:30 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by The Architect Of Fate - August 15, 2021 at 7:38 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by Ferrocyanide - February 17, 2022 at 7:35 pm
RE: Anti-nuclear bomb? - by The Grand Nudger - February 19, 2022 at 7:53 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Arguing with Anti-Vaxxer friend LadyForCamus 31 6943 September 9, 2018 at 12:43 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Anti-Matter at CERN chimp3 24 6124 December 21, 2016 at 7:12 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  The Nuclear Age, and the nuclear threat TheBeardedDude 7 3566 November 13, 2013 at 7:53 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  How to hide a nuclear meltdown in Nebraska. Anymouse 3 2999 June 21, 2011 at 12:54 am
Last Post: BethK
  Brian Cox: Im-not-anti-religion.-Im-anti-maniac KichigaiNeko 14 8406 April 4, 2011 at 4:24 am
Last Post: Violet
  heat output of SCRAMed nuclear reactor Anomalocaris 10 6824 March 21, 2011 at 7:04 am
Last Post: leo-rcc
  Dark Matter may be Anti-Baryonic matter Autumnlicious 1 2312 December 9, 2010 at 2:11 am
Last Post: theVOID



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)